MedMalPredict

Arkansas · AR

Medical malpractice in Arkansas

Constitution blocks a damages ceiling

Arkansas medical malpractice claims generally must be filed within two years of the wrongful act itself, not from discovery. The state constitution blocks legislative caps on recovery for personal injury or death in ordinary malpractice cases.

Last reviewed September 22, 2026

Damages cap
None

The constitution bars a general compensatory ceiling

Usual filing window
2 years

From the wrongful act, not from discovery

Discovery rule
Narrow

Foreign objects and some claims for young minors

01

Damage caps

Arkansas has no enforceable statutory ceiling on economic or noneconomic compensatory damages in private medical malpractice suits. Article 5, section 32 of the Arkansas Constitution generally bars laws that limit recovery for personal injury or death. That is a constitutional rule, not merely the absence of a statute. Do not treat a remittitur practice as a damages cap.

Not capped

Economic damages

Economic damages are limited by proof. There is no general statutory ceiling on compensatory recovery for personal injury or death.

Ark. Const. art. 5, § 32 (opens in a new tab)

No cap

Noneconomic damages

There is no enforceable statutory noneconomic ceiling for an ordinary private medical malpractice claim. Article 5, section 32 says no law shall be enacted limiting the amount to be recovered for injuries resulting in death or for injuries to persons or property, with an employment carve-out. The constitution, not legislative silence, is what blocks a general cap.

Do not describe a soft remittitur statute as a functional cap. A printed punitive formula should be read against Bayer CropScience LP v. Schafer, which applied article 5, section 32 to a punitive ceiling. This page does not state a punitive dollar amount.

Ark. Const. art. 5, § 32 (opens in a new tab)

Bayer CropScience LP v. Schafer. The Arkansas Supreme Court has enforced article 5, section 32 against laws that limit recovery for personal injury or death, including in a punitive-damages setting. This page does not treat a printed punitive formula as a current malpractice ceiling.

Punitive damages

Legislative punitive ceilings have been struck or limited under article 5, section 32. Confirm any punitive theory on the facts. This page does not state a punitive dollar formula.

Ark. Const. art. 5, § 32 (opens in a new tab)

02

Filing deadlines

File within two years of the act in most cases. Foreign objects left in the body and certain claims for young minors follow special rules. Do not assume a broad discovery rule will save a late filing.

General rule

An action for medical injury must be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrues. Accrual is the date of the wrongful act complained of, and no other time.

Ark. Code § 16-114-203 (opens in a new tab)

Foreign object

If the claim is based on a foreign object that was not discovered, and could not reasonably have been discovered, within two years, the action must be commenced within one year of discovery or of when it reasonably should have been discovered, whichever is earlier.

Young minors

If the patient was age 9 or younger at the act, the later of the eleventh birthday or two years from the act applies. A limited further discovery path can run to the nineteenth birthday if the injury was not known by age 11.

Expert proof

Expert testimony on the locality standard of care remains central. Summerville v. Thrower held that the affidavit statute's automatic-dismissal mechanism was unconstitutional as a procedural rule in conflict with court rules. This page does not treat that dismissal mechanism as a live gate that ends a case on a short clock.

Ark. Code § 16-114-203 (opens in a new tab)

03

What cases often look like

These notes describe public legal patterns. They are not case counts, win rates, or rankings.

  1. The clock runs from the act

    The deadline headline is two years from the wrongful act, not from discovery. That occurrence rule is a frequent reason a claim is too late.

    Ark. Code § 16-114-203 (opens in a new tab)

  2. The constitution blocks a compensatory ceiling

    The valuation headline is the absence of an enforceable compensatory cap. Article 5, section 32 is the reason, not a gap in the malpractice statutes.

    Ark. Const. art. 5, § 32 (opens in a new tab)

  3. Expert proof still decides the case

    Summerville v. Thrower removed the automatic-dismissal mechanism from the affidavit statute. Locality expert proof can still decide summary judgment.

04

Payout context

Payment amounts vary by year, injury, and setting. This page does not state an average payout, a median, or a case count. To predict the payout for an Arkansas case, use MedMalPredict AI - Medical Malpractice Outcome Prediction.

Without an enforceable compensatory ceiling, proof of liability, causation, and damages drives value.

05

Sources

Official statute and agency pages checked September 22, 2026. First research pass on September 22, 2026. This summary still needs legal review before it is treated as legal advice. Arkansas has no enforceable statutory cap on compensatory medical malpractice damages. Arkansas Constitution article 5, section 32 bars laws limiting recovery for personal injury or death outside the employment relationship. The Arkansas Supreme Court has enforced that clause against damage-limiting statutes, including punitive-cap applications in Bayer CropScience LP v. Schafer. This page does not state a punitive dollar formula. The statute of limitations is an occurrence rule: two years from the wrongful act under Arkansas Code section 16-114-203, not a general discovery rule, with foreign-object and limited minor exceptions. The affidavit statute still exists in text, but Summerville v. Thrower, 369 Ark. 231 (2007), struck the automatic-dismissal mechanism as a procedural rule. This page does not treat that dismissal mechanism as a live filing gate. Expert proof on the locality standard of care remains essential. Prefer an official legislature deep link when one is confirmed. Fresh cap proposals are bills only until enacted.

  1. Ark. Const. art. 5, § 32 (constitution index) (opens in a new tab)Accessed September 22, 2026
  2. Ark. Code § 16-114-203 (statute mirror) (opens in a new tab)Accessed September 22, 2026

Review a case with MedMalPredict

Use MedMalPredict to organize records and timelines. Speak with an Arkansas attorney promptly, because the occurrence clock can run before an injury is obvious.

Disclaimer

This page summarizes publicly available state law for general information. It is not legal advice. Deadlines and caps can change. Consult a licensed attorney in the state for advice on a specific case.

Last reviewed September 22, 2026.